While Im not against tweetstorming, and have in fact encouraged it, there are certain strategies to it, and certain difficulties. How someone approaches these difficulties provides crucial context for the value of the tweetstorm. The U. S. president, for example, rarely manages to thread his own tweetstorms. In 2. 01. 6, after killing blogs dead, Twitter considered massively expanding its character limitor,Read more Read. Context clues abound. Does the user know how many tweets theyll sendDoes the hundredth tweet deliver on the promises of the first, or does the thread spill out, like over noticed political consultant Eric Garlands, into a rambling mess Does the writer compose each tweet as a standalone unit, fit for retweeting, or do they break off in the middle of sentences, proving that they should have put their rant on Medium instead, but chose Twitter because theyre desperate to have every sentence liked Under the model depicted in TNWs screenshots, these signifiers would disappear. Twitter, says TNW, would automatically split a block of text into multiple tweets, then attach a clean parenthetical count to each. The storm would approach and dump its contents, just a long essay poorly broken up into tweets, calling attention to just how weird and dumb a tweetstorm can appear, while simultaneously wiping away the organic markers of the writers unhinged approach. Of course, users will always have the choice to tweetstorm the old fashioned way. The real danger is what new horrors the users will achieve with the feature. Most of the existing features only ruined Twitter because of their unintended consequences. Ratchet Clank 3 Pc Download Free on this page. What can spammers, hoaxers, and Nazis achieve with this new tool Probably more than the well behaved users, who just want a nice place to put one sentence at a time.