They called the old one Classic. Some say that sounds like its old and in its way out. Others prefer the dictionary definition of recognized and established value or traditional. The obvious solution would be to call it Lightroom Pro, but that would suggest the new baby Lightroom wouldnt be suitable for Pros when it grows up. The fact Adobe avoided that suggests they plan on making the new Lightroom CC suitable for pro workflows in the future too. I think thats reassuring. Classic didnt get many new features. Install Python In Puppy Linux Download. Its true, Classic didnt get a long list of new features. On the other hand, Lightroom users have been begging for performance improvements, editing improvements and bug fixes for years. They start seriously working on these issues and now were complainingAnd why bother to work on these issues if theyre planning to kill it off soon Learn from History. I cant foresee the future, although it would be a handy skill. We can, however, learn from what theyve done in the past. Lets take Photoshop as an example. Adobe announced that future releases would only be available on subscription, but they kept selling the perpetual license of the old one. Once the vast majority of users had moved to subscription, they then killed off perpetual. Theyve just done the same with Lightroom, so theres a pattern. What can we learn from thisAdobe makes some odd decisions at times, but they are good at making money. They dont kill off a profitable part of their business until most customers have moved over to a new product. How does that helpOk, lets assume that theyre eventually going to kill off Lightroom Classic. History would suggest they wouldnt do that until they have a viable alternative for the majority of their customers. Now lets imagine that alternative in waiting is the new baby Lightroom CC app, all grown up. There are currently some major limitations that make it impossible for many users to migrate Its lacking important features. Thatll take time to develop, and theyre looking to the community to learn which features are most important to us. It requires fast internet. Gary. Thanks for the summary Matt But I have to say. Why not just give the new Lightroom CC a new name They have had a product in Lightroom for a decade, and that. Looking for Lightroom Presets We are the Biggest Source of both Paid and Free Lightroom Presets. Get inspired and Download them instantly right here Today at the Adobe Max conference, they announced the future of Lightroom. Theres lots of changes and plenty of confusion, so heres all the FAQs you need. Either the majority of the world needs superfast internet, which would take a long time, or they need some kind of selective sync, or local network sync, or You dont want some or any of your photos stored in the cloud, either for privacy or space reasons. Ok, selective sync again Some kind of local storage only switch Adobe hinted thats already on their radar in their FAQ. Once theyve addressed these issues and no doubt a few more besides then potentially Lightroom CC could be a good fit for the majority of Lightroom users, and Adobe could be in a position to kill off Lightroom Classic. But that couldnt happen overnight, so how long would it takeI dont know. Technology moves fast, but that same time span equally gives other companies time to develop and improve alternative photography applications, so we have plenty of choice. My point Even if we assume that Adobe is going to cease Lightroom Classic development at some point, theres no rush to make a decision about whats next. So many things can change in that time. Lightroom CC may grow up to be even better than Lightroom Classic Adobe must have learned a few lessons along the way or another company may bring out a new superduper competitor. Im not saying that it is or isnt going to happen I dont know the future any more than you do but even if we look at a worst case scenario of our beloved Lightroom being killed off someday, logically theres no reason to panic anytime soon.